Who from animals the cleverest? If to judge on Russian fairy tales, – Lisa Patrikeevna. The modern children spending of many time at the TV, will disagree with it, They will confidently tell – the jackrabbit. Well, and the expert in a zoopsychology, leaning on firm The established scientific facts, will give a palm to subhuman primates.
From ours dwelling now on the earth chetverorukih relatives and Genetical, and on a constitution of a brain the chimpanzee is the closest to us. Probably, They also are the cleverest and capable. Chimpanzees are easily trained, when we want To inoculate it any skill, and given to itself, willingly copy Our actions.
About monkey’s mind and ability to be trained knew for a long time. The French trainer P.Gashe-Suple who had, as well as our well-known compatriot V.L.Durov, taste To psychology, considered that elephants and some breeds of dog are peer to monkeys only. As criterion of mental development it used ability to be trained, More precisely – a pliability to training. As the skilled trainer, it should To know that one tricks are given to animals easier, and others it is more difficult, but could not offer The list of control problems on training to think up concrete tests, on the establishment Which it would be possible to state an exact assessment to mental faculties of animals. Instead it did an emphasis on ability of an animal to submit to will of the person, Including in this concept and their degree priruchaemosti.
Ability to be trained, undoubtedly, is one of the major characteristics Intelligence developments. About it already there was a speech. Now it is necessary to survey one From the major features of psychics of the higher animals – development in them roughly-research Activity.
At acquaintance to subhuman primates at us in the north, where they placed For a reliable lattice and carefully sponsored by the person, are released from all cares – Acquisitions of nutrition, necessity always to be on the alert, daily building Niduses for a lodging for the night that is why have enough big leisure, you are surprised, how many To time and with what self-oblivion of a chimpanzee are capable to be given to studying any Toys, any complex subject which has appeared in their cell. The most surprising, That this game, lasting hours, is carried out absolutely disinterestedly.
Certainly, having disassembled consistently six nested dolls, the monkey will not refuse to eat Nut or the plum which has appeared on a place seventh, but the interest to a toy at once Radically varies. The animal will not potter long any more with nested dolls, To separate them and to try to put again, to thrust one half in an excavation Another to investigate this excavation a dactyl, stukat nested dolls the friend about the friend or To throw on a floor, listening to notes which they emit. Now, having received Toy in the collected kind, a chimpanzee, without lingering, will reach plum, If it there is put, and will lose interest to nested dolls. And if inside Will find nothing, can become angry outright, but game with nested dolls already Will not renew.
Curiosity or inquisitiveness is expressed at monkeys in roughly-research Activity? As scientists in the researches went down downwards On a phylogenetic ladder of animal kingdom, they have found that reactions Animals on novelty, on new and not clear it the phenomena or subjects vary. From roughly-research they gradually turn in purely rough. The phenomenon it is easily explainable. Degradation of roughly-research activity It is caused by many circumstances.
The First cause purely technical. The lowest animals have no the necessary Adaptations for realisation of research activity. Put Before a dog a nested doll also observe that it begins to do with it. In comparison With a monkey of its possibility are scanty. The majority of dogs will confine that carefully Will sniff at a toy and if will not find an odour of a food, other dog or any Beast, to a nested doll interest immediately will lose. The rare dog will consider necessary liznut it to take in dens or to tamper with a paw. That’s all its research possibilities.
The Second cause – a brain level of development. To be engaged in the research Activity, it is necessary to be able to move with gyruses, and for this purpose it is necessary, That they were. Other changes are bound to deficiency of cerebral activity also Roughly-research behaviour. Wide inquisitiveness, which We observed at monkeys, replace uzkospetsificheskie interests. Less educed animals Seldom ask a question: “What is it?” Usually them interests: whether And in a breeding season: whether
What level of development of a brain is necessary for realisation of orientation responses? On this question scientists do not have common opinion. One explorers bind appearance At animal typical orientation responses with the beginning of formation of a cortex of the head Brain, that is since reptiles. Others come to a conclusion about existence Orientative reflex already at a stage of fishes, the higher molluscums, hexapods, Crustacea And hearts.
Observations over ants-scouts in terrain belonging to them show, What is the attention involves all – nutrition, enemies, a road condition, above-ground and underground Constructions, building stuffs, presence of food stores on the mediate Bases, counter ants-furazhiry and ants-scouts. Not less visually shows Orientation response at a sea worm polihety-nereis when it surveys The mink who has met to it.
Abilities to notice novelty to answer it roughly-research It is not necessary to be trained by reaction. Animals receive this ability from the parents In a ready kind. I.P.Pavel was completely agree that the rough Jerk – reaction congenital, but considered that it occupies as though the mediate Position between conditional and unconditional jerks as it is easily depressed (zatormazhivaetsja) as a new stimulus, repeating, becomes The usual.
As were convinced of laboratories Pavlova, the conditioned reflex is developed, when In a cerebral cortex meet two excitation. The first – more weak, caused The stimulus, which any reactions, except an orientative reflex, not Causes, the second – stronger, bound to action of an unconditional stimulus – Defensive, alimentary or other important reaction for an organism. Involuntarily There is a question: and that will be if to spend combinations of two stimuluses causing Only an orientative reflex?
In laboratories Pavlova in the beginning of expansion of work on brain studying Have perceived that the conditioned reflex is a special case rather rasprostrannogo the phenomena: Formations of time communication. When we get acquainted with the new person, involuntarily We peer into his face, we remember separate lines. Their combination is unique, It is characteristic only for the given concrete person. From these lines, signs The mode of this person arises and is stored in a brain. Therefore, having met it Again, we unmistakably learn it. And the mode is formed thanks to formation Sets of time communications between the separate stimuluses, separate signs: The form of the person, in the dimension and colour of eyes, the form and in nose size, character of a flexure Brows, features of labiums, forehead, a chin, cheekbones, eyelashes, ears, colours of a skin : Even features of a hair, and for men and vegetation on a chin and on the top To labium though these signs are rather changeable, by all means enter into a mode of everyone The person.
Whether It is possible to prove, what exactly such path thanks to set formation Time communications the mode is formed? It appears, it is possible! In the nature it is very rare The solitary stimuluses react. Usually any phenomenon falls upon an animal The whole complex of the interconnected signals. Therefore along with the usual simple Stimuluses of phylum of a call, action kasalki, light flashes in laboratories I.P. Pavlova the complexes compounded of several similar began to be used Stimuluses. It has appeared that conditioned reflex formation on a simple stimulus Anything essential does not differ from formation of conditioned reflexes on their complex. Unless at use of complexes they are developed slightly faster Also happen stronger, than on the solitary stimuluses.
Studying conditioned reflexes on a complex, physiologists have, of course, taken an interest, As animals react to its separate components. We will assume that jerk It was developed on a simultaneous complex – joint action of three stimuluses – A call, kasalki and light of an electrical lamp. Assay of these components, when Jerk on a complex has already well become stronger, has taped an interesting detail: light Caused very weak jerk, actions kasalki – slightly larger, and a call – Almost same jerk, as the whole complex.
Explorers have been prepared for similar results. For a long time already it was known, That the conditioned reflex size is in known dependence on character The conditioned excitator. Usually on visual stimuluses if they do not change The situation in space, and on weak dermal stimuluses conditional Jerks do not reach appreciable sizes. But on sound and olfactory Stimulants the conditioned reflex size can be impressive. Pavels has explained This phenomenon physiological force of stimuluses. It has appeared that on entering In a complex the weak stimuluses tested separately, always arises Weak conditioned reflex or they are absolutely not capable it to cause.
Scientists assumed that in process of conditioned reflex consolidation on a complex Its weak components eventually will get ability to cause the conditional Jerk, and that already caused it, jerk size will increase. Check Actions of components in a month-two, in half a year of daily training of jerk On a complex not only has not taped augmentation of size of jerk at weak components, And, on the contrary, has found appreciable weakening or its disappearance on the strong Stimuluses. This process could be accelerated if from time to time to test Action of separate components, without accompanying them podrepleniem, action of the unconditional Stimulus.
At first sight, at experimental dogs the paradoxical phenomena were observed – Stimuluses, each of which, reacting separately, did not cause any alimentary Reactions, at sharing led to an appreciable hypersalivation. This results from the fact that in the course of development of a conditioned reflex of a dog begin To accept a complex as the special, independent, integrated stimulus. In To their brain “mode” of this complex is formed, and only it appears bound With the alimentary centre, only it is capable to cause in it excitation.
Studying of complex stimuluses, apparently, has dealt with a formation question Modes. However itself Pavels has not been completely satisfied by it, after all the depressing The majority of modes arises at us without participation of unconditional stimuluses. Silent Leafage rustle, original aroma and the whole complex of the diversified visual The stimuluses causing occurrence of mass of associations, frame a mode of ours Russian wood. Into it an indispensable component do not enter neither alimentary, nor defensive Elements. Therefore physiologists needed to prove, as at animals modes can To be formed without participation of unconditional stimuluses.
I.P.Pavel has been assured that the associations easily arising at people and it is good Known to psychologists, can be developed and at animals. We already mentioned that This confidence has laid down in a basis of the concept of mechanisms of the mental framed by it Activity. He assumed that at a combination of stimuluses – simultaneous Presentation of light, action kasalki and a call – between them there will be time Communications – associations and thanking it the mode of a complex stimulus will be generated. But how it to prove? How to learn, what is created in a brain of a dog? It about it not You will ask. It is necessary for dog to ask questions in such form that it could Them to answer and this answer to us would be clear. Such form of dialogue it was possible To think up.
The Scheme of experiments has appeared surprisingly simple. At first spent 20-40 Combinations of two stimuluses, for example kasalki and a call. Then, to find out, Whether time communication was formed between them, on one of these stimuluses developed Conditioned reflex then checked the second stimulus. If after development Conditioned reflex on action kasalki the call too appeared is capable to cause Conditioned reflex, it meant that between stimuluses combined earlier There was really a time communication.
New experiment has allowed to be convinced of possibility of formation of associations And to track, as they are bridged among themselves and as such chains function. In the resulted example at first there was an association a call – kasalka, then kasalka – Nutrition. The chain of two parts has as a result turned out, capable to transfer The information from the centre to the centre. Call action provokes the conforming centres The sound analyzer, from here excitation is transferred in the dermal analyzer, and Therefrom – in the alimentary centre, causing the conforming reaction of an animal.
Formation of time communications, or associations, between “indifferent” stimuluses It is carried out on the basis of the excitation caused by novelty, stimulating development Orientation response of an animal. Strong associations arise only at the advanced Beings – mammals and auks. They possess especially appreciable firmness At monkeys thanks to what their value has strongly increased in life of these animals. Thus, formation of associations probably only when a design Brain becomes enough made.
Ability of animals to use new phylum of time communications – the important stage The psychics developments, the discovered boundless open space for their informative activity. If conditioned reflex formation is mastering only the major for animals Patterns of an external world formation of associations is a catching of communications Between any phenomena which even not are not representing for them immediate interest. Wide operating by associations has made us people, having allowed to seize Speech. Associations have provided communication of separate concepts with certain words, Become notations and signals of these concepts. At the heart of our speech and ours Intellections lie the uncountable associations daily formed by a human brain. Time communication – a basis of associations, a basis of all kinds of mental activity.
Tracing, as in the course of evolution of alive organisms from the most primitive Buildings to the person any function inclusive educes, it is possible More deeply to perceive features of its realisation at the person, where experiment possibilities Are understandably rather circumscribed. Rather-physiological The approach – the important method of knowledge of the most complex functions, first of all functions Brain. It is a corner stone of evolutionary physiology. The founder This new scientific discipline which have received in our country wide recognition, The Leningrad physiologist, outstanding Soviet scientific academician L.A.Orbeli is.